Defendant

1. On April 25, 2016, at the office of the branch office of the Gyeonggi-do Association of deaf-Minsia located in C on April 25, 2016, the dementia patients are victims E, the head of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the Association of deaf-Minsia, while the number of members, who are deaf-Minsia, are reported to be maintained.

As a person who has caused a false horse dispute, there is no qualification to do so, this paper forged Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Documents.

“ mean to the effect that it is:

2. At the first floor coffee shop of the same building around 19:00 on the same day, the “victim” is a dementia patient among the 10 members of the deaf-mutes who have been reported.

had influenced.

' ‘Publicly insulting the victim’, i.e., sexually insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Partial statement of witness G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Legal mitigation under Articles 11 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (Agricultural-mutes);

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (the fact that the defendant is the deaf-mute, the defendant has no record of crime against the defendant, and there are some circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the crime in this case, the age, sex, environment, etc. of the defendant);