around 00:01 on February 6, 2014, the Defendant, “2014 Highest 984,” was a victim E (the age of 48) who was a other driver, while drinking alcohol at the main point of “D” located in Jung-gu Busan, Jung-gu, Busan, and became a vision. The Defendant, “The victim E”, was satisfying the e-mail of the victim E and sating the face of the victim E, where the number of treatment days cannot be known to the victim E.

"2014 Highest 2337"

1. On February 27, 2014, at around 23:20, the Defendant damaged the victim F (hereinafter “Dju”)’s “C” operated in Busan Jung-gu, Busan (hereinafter “Seoul-gu, 48 years of age), that the victim deemed “the victim’s wife” to be “the victim’s wife,” on the ground that the victim did not have any desire for the Defendant’s wife,” and that the victim’s remaining alcohol on the table is “the victim’s body.” On the ground that the victim did not divers about the Defendant’s wife, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s loss, such as diversing the remaining alcohol on the floor, e.g., raising the remaining alcohol on the table, and e., e.

2. In the above date, at the place, the injured Defendant 1 was aware of the victim’s head debt collection, and the victim’s face face was taken by drinking, and the victim’s face cannot be identified.

"2014 Highest 3138"

1. On March 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 19:30 on March 4, 2014, at the “D” point operated by the Victim F (hereinafter “F”) in Busan Jung-gu, Busan on or around February 27, 2014, when the Defendant was prosecuted due to the Defendant’s assaulting the victim and his employees and destroying the crypt, the Defendant was punished on or around February 27, 2014, the Defendant: (b) “When the Defendant was punished due to the crypt; (c) 5 million won in cash; (d) written applications, written agreements, and a certificate of personal seal impression was prepared; and (d) the Defendant would inflict a threat as if he was collected by the victim; (d) as if he did not respond to the Defendant’s demand while drinking; and (e) as soon as he did so by the date on which he did not respond to the Defendant’s demand on the cryth of the same month following the day.”