If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Defendant

C owns the land of Gangnam-si, and Defendant C is the legal spouse of Defendant C, and Defendant C is the legal spouse of Defendant C. The Defendants, on the land purchased by Defendant C, are dissatisfied with what there is a cement packaging road with a large of 3 meters wide range of cement packaging roads used by the residents of the surrounding villages, and have the mind to interfere with the passage of residents by preventing the above road.

1. On April 2013, Defendant C and Defendant A jointly committed a crime refers to the laying of a fence on the cement Packing road located in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si, and Defendant A around that time, Defendant C and Defendant C installed iron pents with a height of 1.95 meters in height and about 20 meters in length at the above road.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with traffic by causing the passage through land.

2. Defendant C and Defendant B’s co-principaled co-principaled on June 2013, 2013: (a) the co-principaled Defendant C and Defendant B’s co-principaled the cement packaging road in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si; and (b) around that time, Defendant B used the network value to set up cement packaging on the road; (c) approximately two meters of cement fixs of department cement, and (d) stored them on the road.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to damage the road and thereby interfered with the traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Each statement of a witness H and I in the second trial records;

1. A suspect interrogation protocol of the police officer;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of photograph (106 pages of investigation records);

1. Defendants: Articles 185 and 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: The Defendants shall be punished by a fine

1. Defendant C whose concurrent crimes are aggravated: the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on the assertion by the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendants and defense counsel’s assertion

A. The instant case.