beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.10.14 2014고단2140

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 20:50 on July 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) driven a B-cub vehicle from the 1km section to the roads from the short-term driving in front of the Central Library of Heunging City, which had a blood alcohol concentration of 0.109% under the influence of alcohol; and (b) the Defendant driven a B-cub vehicle from the 1km section to the same distance.

2. On July 2, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, as described in paragraph (1), driven a B Ecoos car under the influence of alcohol, and made the four-lane road in front of the Central Library of the City of the City of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of

Since there is a cross-section where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to reduce speed and drive safely according to signals.

Nevertheless, while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left on the straight signal in violation of the good, and was driven by the victim C (IB) who was proceeding in accordance with the straight line in the opposite direction, and was driven by the victim C (IBB) as the front part of the said Ecuas car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as cerebral alky, in detail as to which medical treatment for about three weeks is required.

3. In order to avoid a traffic accident while under the influence of alcohol as described in paragraphs (1) and (2), the Defendant called “F, the president of the E Institute, in which the Defendant works, to have the Defendant make a statement that F was driving, and let F make a false confession.

Accordingly, the Defendant, at around 20:50 on July 2, 2014, had FF drive a car for 191 on the front of the Library of the 191 City, the Defendant, who was unable to know his name, even though he did not have caused a traffic accident.