상해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
(e).
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 14, 2008, the Defendant, who attempted to join, was holding a astronomical contact with H University located in the Haan-si, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, the Defendant called “L”, “L” operated by the victim K (n, n, n, e) at the victim K (n, n, e, e, e, g., the Defendant was aware of the Defendant as his organized violence (unsect) at an entertainment drinking house operated by the victim K (n, n, e.g., the l, l, l, 100 (10 million won).
When the victim refuses to purchase a ticket, the defendant saw that he would not be a situation for the victim to buy the ticket, he saw the beer's disease to collect it, marked the cryp, cut off the table, and sound, and saw that "I am saw as to who is equal to the bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a son,
As such, the Defendant: (a) intending to receive the price of 100,000 micket 10,000 won from the victim who frightened the victim; (b) but (c) her attempted to report to the police without responding to the request.
2. On September 24, 2009, the Defendant destroyed by: (a) around 24:00 on September 24, 2009, the Defendant: (b) putting the Seongbuk-gu M main store in Yanancheon-si; (c) without any justifiable reason, putting the entrance door from the victim N
In light of the fact that N cannot verify the business operator who received the entrance at the time, the amount in the quotation is considered to be related to the supply price of the Gamashian, and the fact that the Gamashian is considered to mean a cover of the mold in the glass door, etc., it shall be recognized by changing it as above to the extent that does not impair the identity of the facts charged.
3. The Defendant interference with business as described in paragraph (2) from Sep. 22, 2009 to Feb. 24:00 of the same day.