손해배상(의)
1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to Plaintiff A for 5,00,000 won and the period from November 7, 2013 to November 24, 2015.
1. Facts without dispute;
A. On April 2, 2013, in order to alleviate the maternal ar State of the Republic of Korea generated in coaches, Plaintiff A received counseling from Defendant E, who was the intent to impose the child at Defendant D Hospital, and received an accelerator procedure.
Plaintiff
B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A.
B. On April 23, 2013, May 23, 2013, and June 25, 2013, 2013, July 25, 2013, and November 7, 2013, Plaintiff A received from Defendant E an accelerator (hereinafter “instant procedure”) on five occasions, including the following: (a) he/she was performing a procedure to narrow the maternity by stimulating the fiber cells cells in the vicinity of the rocketing and paralog; (b) hereinafter “instant procedure”). < Amended by Act No. 11690, Nov. 7, 2013>
C. At present, Plaintiff A complained of side effects while the state of Maternity has expanded more due to the instant procedure.
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. (1) The plaintiffs' assertion that there was negligence in the instant procedure; (2) The defendant E performed the instant procedure without confirming the fact that the part of the plaintiff A's skin was scarcityd and scarcityd so that it was impossible to perform the instant procedure; and (2) even in the instant procedure, the procedure was performed in a timely manner so as not to cause side effects, such as video, anti-scarking, and fladation; and (3) the process required during the instant procedure, which was conducted five times, was not properly observed.
Therefore, there was a side effect that the mother country, which was part of the plaintiff A's coaches, spread to the whole musta, etc.
(2) The judgment of the court below is not sufficient to acknowledge the plaintiffs' assertion only with the images of the evidence Nos. 4-1 and 2, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, this part of the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit.
Rather, in full view of the images of the evidence Nos. 2 and 4 (including each number), the result of the request for the examination of medical records to the head of the Busan White Hospital affiliated with the Human Resources University of this Court, and the overall purport of the pleadings, the instant medical procedure is not generally damaged by the entire treatment room, but is subject to heat damage only by the minor part in the form of the columns.