A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

[criminal record] On October 26, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment with prison labor for four months for fraud at the Suwon Fagwon, and the judgment was finalized on November 3, 2016.

[2] The Defendants: (a) were aware of the fact that they want to obtain a loan through the Internet and offered a proposal that they would allow a vehicle to be leased by selling the vehicle on a long-term basis; and (b) were willing to rent the vehicle in spite of the absence of their intent or ability to pay the rent normally even if they were given a vehicle under the name of a siren, and agreed with the party who was under the name of a person without the name to rent the vehicle on a long-term basis according to the proposal of the person without the name.

1. On July 2014, Defendant A’s name-free person was frightened as the husband of the Defendant, and the Defendant discussed that he would run as if he was the denial of the Defendant’s name-free person. On the other hand, the name-free person informed G of the contact address of the Defendant as if the denial of the vehicle was long-term leased to the employees G employed at the victim F, and had G contact with the Defendant. On July 11, 2014, the Defendant described “A car lease agreement” as to the vehicle lease contract for the new stringing car to the effect that: (a) around July 11, 2014, the name-free person notified G of the contact address of the Defendant; and (b) the Defendant was able to ordinarily rent the vehicle at the coffee shop where it is difficult to know the trade name of the fleet’s station located on both sides of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul, and the monthly rent was KRW 48 months from the delivery date of the vehicle;

On the other hand, on July 14, 2014, in order to make the same appearance as the actual owner of the vehicle wishes to rent the vehicle normally, the name-free person applied for the order of the vehicle transfer to the victim two times in total, including KRW 6,706,00,000 on the same day and KRW 706,000 on the same day, and the Defendant requested the release of the vehicle to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with the person who was not injured by his name, and he is damaged by him.