However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 22:40 on September 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) heard the police officer D at the office of the Defendant, 22:40, 312, and 401, which called, “to record the scene by a cellphone” from the police officer D belonging to the Yongsan Police Station, who called out after receiving the report 112 of domestic violence; and (b) took a bath to said D, “to record the scene by a cellphone,” and assaulting the police officer D on the back of the said D’s 112 reporting case, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (General circumstances, such as the confession of a crime and the reflective fact, and the absence of any record of punishment exceeding the fine);