If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On August 1, 2013, the Defendant, at around 08:41, taken a gallon of the body part of the victim’s name, who suffered from the ballon flus flus flusium, located in the steel 7-line subway station platform located in the steel 7-line railway station in the Simsan-dong, using a galthroin lusium, in a video image.

2. Around 08:50 on August 1, 2013, the Defendant taken a film of the lower part of the body, such as the victim’s ambane, etc., who suffered a refluort in a subway transit zone in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, using the foregoing method.

Accordingly, the defendant taken two times against his will another person's body, which could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using a camera.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 14 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes under the relevant Act on Criminal Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes committed against Order to attend lectures;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Where a conviction of a defendant against a sex offense subject to the registration of personal information under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act becomes final and conclusive, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to a related agency pursuant to Article 43 of

The age, occupation, risk of recidivism, type, motive, process and seriousness of the crime in this case, the degree and expected side effects of the defendant's disadvantage due to the disclosure order or notification order, the preventive effect of the sexual crime subject to registration which can be achieved due to such order, and the protection of the victim.