(a) Boyang-si, Seoyang-gu, U.S. C. A. 378 square meters of ground steel structure bridges of 378 square meters.

A. On April 10, 2017, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the area of 378 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). On the same day, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the area of 543 square meters (hereinafter “the instant land”) of the Ildong-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Busan-si, Busan-si, Seoul-do.

B. The entire land on the ground of the instant case has a steel structure bridge and a steel structure bridge, and among the land of the instant case 2, there is a steel structure bridge and a steel structure bridge on the ground of 251.2m2m2 (hereinafter referred to as “1”) connected in sequence with each point of 2,3,6, and 2m2 in the annexed drawings among the land of the instant case.

C. The defendant is present as of the closing date of pleadings.

In possession of each of the sanctions listed in the subsection, the land of this case and the land of “1” in the land of this case are occupied and used, respectively.

[Ground of Recognition] A without dispute, the entries and images of Gap evidence 1 through 4, the result of the appraisal commission to the chief executive officer of the Korea Land Information Corporation and the branch office of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant, the owner of the land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case, has the obligation to remove the sanctions constructed on the whole land No. 1 of this case, deliver the land No. 1 of this case, remove the sanctions constructed on the land No. 2 of this case, and deliver the land No. 1 of this case to the Plaintiff.

3. The defendant's assertion is alleged to the purport that the plaintiff cannot accept the plaintiff's claim since the plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case based on the invalid auction procedure. However, according to the respective entries and the purport of the whole pleadings as to the land Nos. 5 and 6 of this case, the plaintiff submitted a certificate of farmland qualification acquisition on the land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case to the voluntary auction procedure (Jibu District Court Goyang support E) before completing the registration of ownership transfer.