However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On October 18, 2016, at around 21:10, the Defendant demanded that the Defendant be subject to violence against the foregoing D, which was called out after receiving a report from 112 on the front of the Category C located in the Gwangju Mine District, by leaving the vehicles parked therein, and driving the city expenses on the front of the Category C located in the Gwangju Mine District.

Accordingly, in order for the F to make the Defendant’s statement, the Defendant: (a) was aboard the patrol car as the earth; and (b) the Defendant: (c) was the F of the above circumstances, “Isle to be discarded, and several times of age;

several slaughters, with the patrol car in the dog, n.e. n. n.s. n.s.

”라고 욕설을 하며 위 경위 F의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고, 함께 출동한 순경 G의 팔목 부위를 긁고 발로 복부 부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the processing of 112 reports, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim G (28 years of age) such as the sprinking of a wall that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, damage to the sprinking of descendants, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement in each police statement with respect to F and G;

1. A photograph of the part of the victim G himself/herself;

1. 112 Reported case handling lists, and global posts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishments imposed on the crimes of serious bodily injury);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. In light of the background and method of the instant crime for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, the sentence as indicated in the disposition shall be determined in consideration of the following: (a) although the nature of the instant crime is not good in light of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) the Defendant’s reflectiveness; (c) the Defendant has no record of committing a crime exceeding