If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

No one may use a trademark identical or similar to another person's registered trademark on goods identical or similar to the designated goods.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from February 2013 to the first police officer of the same year.

3. From the building located in Ulsan-gu B, Ulsan-gu, to the 15th day, the trademark infringement was committed by selling mobile phone cases with a trademark, such as a watch, a percentage, which is a trademark registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office, and thereby selling the relevant mobile phone cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. C’s statement (including copies and photographs of the trademark register attached thereto);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Article 93 of the relevant Articles of the Trademark Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Articles 97-2 (1) and 93 of the Trademark Act that are subject to forfeiture;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.