2. In full view of the circumstances revealed by the lower court in the grounds for sentencing and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s sentence that the Defendant rendered against the Defendant is deemed appropriate, and is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable, and there are no other special circumstances to change the above sentence. Thus, the above unfair argument of sentencing by the Defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, since it is obvious that Defendant B’s “Defendant B” among the application of the statute of the lower judgment is a clerical error of Defendant A, it is obvious that it is a concurrent offender.