When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives a car at CNS.

On July 6, 2013, at around 00:05, the Defendant driven the said car and proceeded at about 80 km in the direction of the deceased in the direction of the deceased from the galside of the inside of the safe city according to the first two-lane road in front E, E, which is located in D when he is safe.

In such cases, the defendant has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering direction and brakes well, and to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving on a stroke by neglecting it, shocked the central separation zone located on the left side of the running direction of the Defendant, and left the right side of the road, and shocked down the drails, KT telegraph, and gas station signboards in order.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, destroyed 3,312,00 won for repair costs, damaged the KT telegraph poles managed by the victim G to the extent that the repair cost of 645,00 won was damaged, and damaged the gas station signboards managed by the victim H to the extent that the 1,400,000 won for repair costs was damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement prepared by H and F;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Evidence and photographs related to the accident;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to written statements, written estimates, written estimates, written estimates, and written estimates;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;