However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

From June 30, 2009 to June 30, 2012, the Defendant concluded each check contract with the original branch of the National Bank of Korea and the spouse C from August 6, 2012, and traded household checks.

On October 2013, the Defendant issued one copy of the household check in the name of the said C, which became “E”, “E”, “date of issuance”, and “three million won” at the place of business operated by the Defendant in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu., the Defendant issued one copy of the check in the name of the Defendant.

On March 31, 2014, the Defendant, at the time of the payment proposal, failed to pay the check to the above national bank due to the shortage of deposit even though the check was presented to the above national bank.

From around that time to March 10, 2014, the Defendant issued 1, 4, 5, 9, 14, 15, 26, and 29 a letter of family check 8 (total amount of 28 million won) as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes (1), and presented a payment proposal within the period of each payment proposal, but each holder of a check did not receive a payment suspension disposition.

From June 30, 2009 to June 6, 2012, the Defendant concluded each check contract with the original branch of the National Bank of Korea and the spouse C from August 6, 2012, and traded household checks.

On February 2, 2014, the Defendant issued one copy of the household check in the name of the above C, which became “F”, “F” on the date of issuance,” and “5,000,000 won” at the place of business operated by the Defendant, located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, Daejeon, as the Defendant’s workplace operating.

On June 30, 2014, the Defendant presented the check to the Nonghyup Bank on June 30, 2014, which was within the time limit for presentment for payment, but did not receive the check as a suspension of transaction.

In addition, the Defendant issued KRW 34,00,000 in total amount of eight face value of household checks, as stated in [Attachment 2] Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 6, 10 through 12 in early February 2014, and presented payment within the respective period of payment, but did not receive as suspension of transaction.

b)a summary of the evidence;