The defendant is a Chinese office delivery center.

On March 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) entered the victim’s residence through the entrance door of the victim’s residence, which was not corrected without the victim’s permission, in order to recover the b02 house from the residence of the victim C (26 years, n, n, n, n) around 18:00, and invaded the victim’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the suspension of sentence is against the enemy and there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, and the fact that it was punished in the course of finding a wrong delivery) of the suspended sentence;