근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The Defendant is an employer who has run a spawn and spawn retail business by employing two full-time workers, the representative errors of Co., Ltd., the head office of which is located B at the time of the Government.
The Defendant was in the foregoing workplace from November 26, 2014 to December 14, 2018 and did not pay KRW 8,836,747 of D retirement pay within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement between the parties on the extension of the due date.
2. Determination of applicable provisions of Acts: subparagraph 1 of Article 44 and Article 9 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act: Judgment dismissing public prosecution as a result of a written agreement on July 18, 2019, which states the victim's reasons not to be punished, after a public prosecution under the proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act is instituted: Subparagraph 6 of Article 327 of