2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

On January 8, 1993, the Plaintiff became a member of the company B and was in charge of shipping and packaging the Kabble products. On March 22, 2018, around 15:30 minutes, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as having been in charge of the business of shipping and packaging the Kabble products. On March 22, 2018, the Plaintiff was in charge of the packing work at the above company’s establishment and transferred to the waiting room due to the axis of the fee that was in the vicinity of the company, and turned back to the waiting room, and returned to the left side with the math of the fee that was in the vicinity of the company.

On April 13, 2018, the Plaintiff submitted an application for initial medical care to Defendant Corporation on the ground that the instant injury and disease occurred due to high physical strength in the workplace, and due to the environment of noise, dust, etc., but Defendant Corporation issued a non-approval disposition on June 5, 2018 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that there is no sudden change in the Plaintiff’s work hours, work environment, etc., and it cannot be found that proximate causal relation with the instant injury and disease cannot be found, such as the absence of any sudden change in work hours, work environment, etc., and failure to meet the criteria.

The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee on August 14, 2018, but was dismissed on November 8, 2018.

The reason for dismissal was that there is no matter that can be recognized as having caused excessive work, such as overtime work beyond the ordinary level, and there is no fact that can be judged as psychological stress causing epidemal changes in connection with the work, and that there is no substantial causal relation with the work of this case because it is difficult to deem that the work of this case was excessive enough to influence the injury and disease of this case.

【Ground of recognition” without any dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 2, entry of Eul 1 and 5, entry of Eul 1 and 5, and entry of the whole purport of pleading in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes.

Plaintiff’s assertion

The plaintiff was engaged in a high physical strength in the poor working environment, and he was at the end of 2017.