beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.10.30 2019고단1117

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 9, 2019, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) entered the 1st floor public service center of the 1st floor of the Korea National Health Insurance Corporation (Seoul High-si, 285) on the ground that it became a problem of imposing health insurance premiums; (b) the Defendant: (c) opened a door to the 285th floor; and (d) opened the door “I’t know how I’t we start to the health insurance; (d) I’t am you am to the victim B (31) who is an employee; and (e) opened the 15th floor public service center; (e) the Defendant took the 15th floor to the 15th floor public service center; and (e) caused the disturbance to the 15th floor public service center; and (e) prevented the employees, including the above B from performing their duties by force by force.

2. The Defendant causing property damage, while taking a bath as described in paragraph (1) at the time and place, and as described in paragraph (1), destroyed the victim’s incombustible portion by generating the market price, which is the ownership of the next mountainous district owned by the National Health Insurance Corporation.

3. The obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant injured the victim: (a) assaulted the victim at the date, time, and place specified in paragraph (1); (b) assaulted the victim, such as the victim’s face, who was a policeman belonging to the said patrol group, to arrest the Defendant in a flagrant offender under the suspicion of interference with duties as described in paragraph (1); and (c) assaulted the victim, who was a policeman belonging to the said patrol group, about two weeks of treatment; and (d) inflicted injury on the victim, such as the victim’s salt, tension, and tension.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. B Written statements;

1. Application of the injury diagnosis certificate and the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the fire extinguishing photographs damaged;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act of this Act concerning criminal facts.

참조조문