A. 1) The Plaintiff married with D, but was married on July 13, 2010, and was married with D on July 13, 2010, and had E and F as children between D and D. 2) The Defendants are children of the network G.

B. 1) The Plaintiff entered into each of the instant insurance contracts with DB Insurance Co., Ltd., as shown in the separate sheet, with the name of the policyholder as shown in the separate sheet, and the beneficiary and the insured entered into each of the instant insurance contracts with D, the former spouse of the Plaintiff, or F, the Plaintiff’s child. 2) From the time of the conclusion of each of the instant insurance contracts, the Plaintiff paid the insurance premium under each of the instant insurance contracts through the account in the name of the Plaintiff or F.

3) On July 4, 2016, H, the spouse of the network G, prepared a written confirmation confirming that each of the instant insurance contracts is the Plaintiff’s insurance. (c) The deceased G died on February 3, 2016, and I, the spouse of the network G, reported the renunciation of inheritance to the father-general branch of the Incheon Family Court on April 28, 2016, and received the said declaration on July 29, 2016. The Defendants, the children of the network G, reported the qualified acceptance to the said court on July 4, 2016, and accepted the said declaration on August 16, 2016. [In the absence of any dispute over recognition, the respective entries in subparagraphs 1 through 8, and the purport of the entire pleadings.]

2. According to the above facts of determination, the deceased G merely became a policyholder of each of the insurance contracts of this case by borrowing the name of the plaintiff, and in substance, the plaintiff is a policyholder of each of the insurance contracts of this case. Thus, the defendants, the deceased G's heir, are obligated to implement the procedure to change the name of the policyholder to the plaintiff as to each of the insurance contracts of this case.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.