However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From around 23:40 on September 27, 2014 to 00:05 on the following day, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the disturbance by 103 Dong-dong 2021, the house of the C located in the Busan Dong-gu, Busan, and 2021, and bucking to the said C at a large interest; (b) obstructed the Defendant by stating that the circumstances E belonging to the Busan Dong-dong Police Station D District of the Busan Dong-dong Police Station called “I am about and return to the Defendant the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police statement statute to E and F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of obstruction of the performance of official duties (6-1 year and April) (6-1 year and April) / there are many violent forces (decision of sentence] but there are no same kind of force, and consideration of the fact that there is no same force, and that there is contravention of the confession of crime, etc.