A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 17, defendant C and Eul requested the defendant D to perform the contract, and the plaintiff borrowed money to the defendant C and Eul in the form that the plaintiff paid the deposit amount to the defendant C and Eul in the form that the plaintiff paid the deposit amount to the defendant C and Eul in the form that the plaintiff paid the deposit amount to the defendant C and Eul in the form that the plaintiff paid the deposit amount to the defendant C and Eul as stated in the attached Form No. 1 of the attached Table No. 1 of the attached Table No. 1 of the attached Table No. 1 of the attached Table No. 1 of the attached Table No. 2 of the above, and the loan amount to the defendant D as stated in the attached Table No. 2 and the attached Table No. 5 of the attached Table No. 1 of the above attached Table No. 1, the plaintiff received part of the loan amount as stated in the attached Table No. 3 of the repayment details, and the repayment details to the defendant No. 2 of the attached Table No. 2 of the defendant No. 315. 25.

According to the above, the defendants are obligated to pay each of the above loans to the plaintiff, and the defendant C is obligated to pay the plaintiff 42 million won to the plaintiff, and the defendant C is obligated to pay the loan 4.5 million won to the plaintiff (i.e., the amount of 4., the amount of 4.5 million won loan - the amount of 3.1 million won repayment - the amount of 9.4 million won (i.e., the amount of 1., the amount of 13.3 million won repayment - the amount of 24.6 million won repayment - the amount of 28.3 million won repayment - the amount of

B. The Plaintiff demanded that Defendant C and B belong to the Plaintiff’s ability to repay and pay the debt, as if Defendant C and B had the ability to repay in the future, and that Defendant C and B pay in lieu of the value of the exercise of the right of redemption of the Defendant C and B. The Plaintiff paid it in lieu of the value of the right of redemption of the Defendant C and B as shown in the attached Tables 1 and 2, as shown in each of the attached Tables 1 and 2. As such, Defendant D acquired money by deceiving the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff must compensate for the damages.

However, the statement in Gap evidence No. 10 alone belongs to the plaintiff.