If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On July 12, 2012, at around 15:50, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “I must do so............. b.” while being under a general investigation with the victim, D, etc., on a case in which the Defendant filed a complaint against the victim C, at the office of the Innch Police Station Innish Police Station, which was located in 479, the Defendant made a general investigation with the victim about 10 persons inside the same office.”

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. E’s statement among the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. In the investigation report (a confirmation with D), (a) the defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that the defendant merely stated that the defendant raised the victim's words, " will do so," or "I wish to do so to do so," but although the defendant's testimony to the effect that he could not hear at the time of the instant case is difficult to believe that the above witness was unable to be aware of in light of the circumstances, such as that the above witness was unable to memory the fact that he was investigated with the defendant in the investigative agency as the case, and that the above statement and the result of the inquiry inquiry of the police officer in charge of the investigation at the time of the instant case are consistent with the fact that all the defendant and the victim expressed in the above evidence E and D's statement and the result of the inquiry of the fact that the defendant and the victim expressed in the instant case were h were

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;