[criminal history] On July 23, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for a crime of obstructing the performance of special official duties at the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 20, 2013.

[2] The Defendant filed a continuous civil petition with the Naju-si on the issue that the dry field owned by the Defendant in Naju-si was poor due to the filling of a nearby dry field, and went into the Naju-si 22 Si Do-si Do-si Do-si, which did not take measures to immediately restore the dry field to its original state. On April 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) prepared one mute dilution (one mcinna) in the extreme liquid chain or Melel dilution (one mcinna), while hiding-si Do-si 22, a viewing-si Do-si Do-si Do-si Do-si, without taking measures to immediately restore to its original state.

At around 15:40 on the same day, the Defendant continued to hold an interview with public officials in charge of civil affairs, such as D and E, F, G, H affiliated with the I Team, J affiliated with the K of the K Myeon Office, L belonging to the K Myeon Office, etc. on the same day, the Defendant runs away from the house where “on the other hand, killed or wounded, and entered the detention house.”

Any person who is not a party to a contract shall take out the new or new characters prepared in advance by putting the sound “ that is not any one.”

In the floor of the conference room, the gas dynasium contained in Australia shall be dynasium and the gas dynasium

By doing any act that seems to have an intention to attach fire, the public officials were threatened.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the civil petition treatment of viewing public officials, and preliminary fire prevention against viewing public officials who are the present building.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and L;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Written replys to a request for appraisal;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history (A), personal identifications, and the current status of expropriations;

1. Article 144(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 136(1) and 16(1) of the Criminal Act that provides for the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of obstructing the performance of special official duties, the choice of imprisonment), Articles 175 and 164 of the Criminal Act.