However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 22, 2018, at around 23:15, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of a water supply agency located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) on the street, the Defendant: (c) received a report of 112 from a police officer affiliated with the D Zone of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station, and called for a presentation of identification card by E; (d) the Defendant called for a police officer to produce identification card “sches, mads, mads, mads, and mads,” and (e) the Defendant pushed the

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by the police.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Investigation report (to attach a black boxe image analysis and to a caps);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the following factors such as the background of the crime of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, the degree of assault, the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the same crime and fine, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment and family relationship