beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.07.22 2013가단1986

소유권말소등기

Text

1. As to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party),

A. As to the real estate listed in the attached Table 1, Defendant B Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 6 (including paper numbers) by reference to the whole purport of the pleadings.

The process of construction of the instant multi-household housing (1) D, E, F, and G (hereinafter “D et al.”) obtained permission to construct three multi-household housing (hereinafter “multi-household housing”) on the land of the Gyeonggi-gu Gyeonggi-do Office (hereinafter “I”) and on the land of the K and the multi-household housing (hereinafter “multi-household housing”) on September 208, 208.

(H) (2) The instant multi-household housing site was added to six parcels of land, including L, M, N, P, P, and Q, by June 24, 2010, until June 24, 2010, and there was a design change permit (However, there was no change in the structure of a building) reflecting the foregoing.

(3) On June 28, 2011, Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) reported the change of the owner of the instant multi-household housing from “D and three other persons” to Defendant B, and the said report was accepted on July 14, 201.

B. On July 7, 2011, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and R, S, and T (hereinafter “Plaintiff Selection”) made a loan claim amounting to KRW 375 million against “Nonindicted 3,000,000,000,000,000 to the Suwon District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch of Suwon District Court Branch of KRW 201Kadan960 as a preserved right, and the instant multi-household house of this case’s multi-household 101, 102, 102, 201, 202, 301, 302, and 101, 102, 201, 201, 202, 202, 202, 301, and 302 of the instant multi-household house of this case’s multi-household house of this case was issued with the indication of the Plaintiff Selection, etc. at will, or with the indication on the outer wall report or the issuance of the provisional attachment (hereinafter “instant”).

(2) The above court shall file an objection with the architect U to entrust the registration of provisional seizure prior to citing the provisional seizure order of this case.