However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Csch Rexton car.

On May 25, 2016, around 15:37, the Defendant driven the said car on the front of the 3 main apartment house 149, the Do-do Do-ro 149, Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-ro

At all times, the crosswalk was installed in the front, and the defendant was followed by the EM3 vehicle driven by the victim D (n, 45 years old) prior to the same direction, so the driver was well aware of the situation, and the driver was obliged to pay a duty to safely drive the vehicle by checking whether there is a person who sets the front door and the left and right.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and stopped the victim F (WM3) who passed the crosswalk as it is due to the negligence of driving the crosswalk, and followed the part of the victim D, who stopped the victim F (W3 years old), in front of the defendant's Bosch Rexton car, and caused the above SM3 passenger lanes to be dissiped in the future due to the shock, thereby getting the victim F's dissipated portion in front of the above vehicle to go beyond the land.

The defendant continued to drive the above SM3 car to the right side without reducing the speed of the above SM3 car, and the victim F, which the defendant is driving on the above SM3 car, is charged to the right side and back wheels of the PPS car, and he was driven by G which stops on the right side of the road, with the front side and back wheels of the HPS or other car driven by G which stops on the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim D, on brain-dead sugars, etc., which do not have any wound in two open for about 3 weeks of medical treatment, and the victim F requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment.