beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.10.28 2016나30607

보험에관한 소송

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. Of the appeal costs, the part arising between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a person who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff as to the C Oralba (hereinafter “Defendant Oralba”). The Plaintiff’s assistant concludes a repair contract with the Plaintiff as to the E Oralba (hereinafter “Plaintiff Oralba”) and entered into a siren contract with the Plaintiff during the repair period.

B. (1) On June 22, 2014, the Plaintiff and B participated in Dives, which moved to the South Yangyang-pacter, starting from the luxan lux on an 14:00 on June 22, 2014.

(2) On June 22, 2014, on June 22, 2014, the Plaintiff driving of the Plaintiff Ortoba, while driving the national highway No. 56 of the light principle in the Hong-gun, Hong-gun, Gangwon-do, along the two sides to Hongcheon-do one lane, and driving a frentoton vehicle (hereinafter “Serenton vehicle”) driving by another club member with the way to turn on emergency, etc. and yield the way to reduce the speed, and then the Plaintiff tried to pass a sirentor vehicle beyond the central line, and then the Plaintiff driven the brenton vehicle before raising the speed.

(3) At around 15:22:22 on the same day, the driver of a sirend vehicle temporarily stops in front of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, but the Plaintiff started to stop on the front side of the sirend vehicle.

(4) B and B, who was a participant of the same project with the vehicle Atoba, was driving ahead of the Plaintiff, was driving ahead of the Plaintiff, but the Plaintiff was passing ahead of B and B at a strong speed beyond the median line, respectively.

(5) At around 15:23:03 on the same day, the driver of a sirend vehicle stops at a point of 100 meters from the Hocheon-gun H Jeoncheon-gun, Hongcheon-do, Gangwon-do, and the Plaintiff passes ahead of the sirend vehicle beyond the median line, and then from around 15:23:05, the Plaintiff was behind the sirend vehicle from around 15:23:05, while lowering the speed of the Plaintiff’s own speed, and then the Plaintiff was behind the sirend vehicle beyond the median line, which was nearly stopped at around 15:23:09.