When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant was appointed as the president of the E Union in Seongbuk-gu Seoul (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Association”) on August 30, 2009 and was reappointed at the residents’ general meeting on August 26, 201, and was at the expiration of the term on August 25, 2013, but continues to perform its president’s duties.

In addition to the matters stipulated in the budget, the president of the association of this case must make a resolution at the general meeting of residents of the association of this case in order to conclude a contract.

On November 2011, the Defendant entered into an agreement on the combined development improvement project (F and E) in the name of the F Housing Redevelopment Project Promotion Committee and the instant association in the Seongbuk-gu Urban Planning Development Office of Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul.

On June 29, 2012, the Defendant, at the third floor of H hotel in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, held a meeting of the fifth board of representatives of the instant association in the third floor of H hotel in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, to select a service company for combined development and to enter into a contract for the case of concluding a contract, the Defendant selected I to enter into a partnership agreement with the total bid price of 1.98 billion won.

As a result, the Defendant entered into an agreement for the combined development rearrangement project (F and E) without a resolution of the resident general meeting of the instant association, selected I to the bid price of KRW 1.98 million, and entered into a contract with the construction office dispute resolution council, which is an existing design company, to change the contract amount of KRW 750 million to the construction office dispute resolution council, and KRW 580 million to the rearrangement company K, which is an existing design company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement of the police concerning L;

1. The president of L's complaint (including the attached agreement on the combined development and rearrangement project, the tender notice, materials of the fifth representatives' meeting and the general meeting of shareholders);

1. According to each of the above evidence, investigation reports (voluntary submission, receipt, such as complainant L and the materials at the general meeting of shareholders), investigation reports (receiving of materials, etc.), and the instant union shall hold a meeting of the board of representatives on June 29, 2012 to determine the bid price as KRW 1.98 billion in the case of the selection of the service company for combined development and the conclusion of the contract.