However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 24, 2016, around 01:20 on the first floor of the building "D" located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, in front of the first floor, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender by private victim F (40 tax) belonging to the police station E District of Incheon Jung-gu, which was called by the Defendant on the 112 report that the Defendant had been taking a fright with the fright at the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes, and at the same time, the victim puts the right side of the number of days of treatment to be treated.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to F or G by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and opinions of victims;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, for the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The offence described in the holding shall refer to the sentencing criteria for the crime of bodily concurrence and serious injury.

General Injury No. 1 (General Injury) In the area of aggravation (in the case of June to 2, and in the case of interference with the execution of official duties)

2. The crime of this case is to be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor as it prevents the execution of official duties and causes injury by assaulting a police officer wearing a uniform called out after receiving a report on the disturbance at the place of business of another person.