However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On June 17, 2017, at around 00:20, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim C who was under the influence of alcohol in front of the exit of the line No. 1074, the subway No. 7, and No. 3, the subway No. 7, and then stolen the Japanese bank physical card No. 1,80,000 won deposited in Samsung 7 mobile phone when the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst herst she

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. CCTV video CDs for crime prevention;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment;

1. The suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is a crime committed against a defendant on the grounds of sentencing, the denial of a crime on the grounds that it is impossible to understand even after confirming the video images recorded on the scene of the crime, the fact that damaged articles have been returned to the victim, the defendant's age, sex, conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as per the order.