When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant entered the housing unit 107 units of Yeongdeungpo-gu Da apartment unit D with the representative C, and entered the daily work contract to receive KRW 50,000 per day on condition of active measures, such as not opening door doors to the services mobilized by the victim DoS Construction Co., Ltd. and the service company E., and entered into the daily work contract to receive KRW 50,000 per day. From January 2013 to January 2013, 2013, the Defendant invaded the residence managed by the victim by entering the above house and interfered with the affairs of sale and sale management, such as the sales contract for the unsold housing units of the victim DoS Construction Co., Ltd., by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. A copy of each protocol of examination of suspect with regard to C by the prosecution (the second, third, fourth, and fifth examination);

1. A copy of each protocol of examination of suspect with respect to F by the prosecution (the second, third, and fourth examination);

1. Copy of the prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. Copy of the prosecutor's statement concerning H;

1. A copy of each police statement made to I;

1. Copy of the statement made by the police in J;

1. A report on investigation (the details of occupancy households in D apartment) and the current status of occupancy households in D apartment;

1. A report of investigation (Submission of a detailed statement of possession household of the FD apartment), D apartment, and a list of D apartment;

1. One copy of the investigation report (the confirmation report on possession, etc. of the unit unit of D apartment) and the list of possession of the D apartment which is dry from H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report an investigation (necessary to notify 20 persons, including KK, etc. of suspect);

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his mistake, that there is no record of punishment other than once a fine for dual punishment, and that the defendant actually did not have any history of punishment.