When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 31, 2014, the Defendant was faced with the vehicle that was driven by C(48 tax, south) victim C(48 tax, south) and was faced with a traffic accident that requires three-day medical treatment.

Therefore, the victim has compensated the defendant for medical expenses and consolation money through insurance management, but the defendant did not receive substantial compensation.

From August 17, 2015, E companies in the Western City D where the victim is working for the victim were engaged in one pocketet demonstration.

1. On October 2, 2015, the Defendant interfering with business: (a) entered the said E Company around 09:29 on October 2, 2015; (b) and (c) the victim is entitled to pay money to the victim,

“In doing so, it interferes with the banking work of the victimized person by force, such as exerting a loud singing, etc., and by finding the injured person again at around 13:42 on the same day, the injured person interfered with the banking work of the victimized person by force by force, such as obsing “the weak value of the mother and child”.

2. The Defendant, using his/her mobile phone on September 29, 2015, using the victim’s mobile phone on September 29, 2015, is going to do so by the victim’s mobile phone. “The Defendant is going to the front of the school in which people attend his/her wife, and is going to sit in his/her office, and is too likely to find it at the house.”

The victim sent a text message of the phrase “ and threatened the victim.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by each police with respect to C (including details on the transmission and reception of text messages attached thereto);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment to 112 table for suspect's act of interfering with the business of the suspect);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intimidation) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;