When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 21, 2014, at around 19:50, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports in front of “C” located in the Jungdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and obstructed the lawful performance of duties by police officers on suppression of crimes and maintenance of public order and security for about 20 minutes, such as intimidation, to the police officers assigned to the police box affiliated with the Seoul mid-gu Police Station D (E) patroler (E) No. 42, where he was called “C” and called “the victim F (the age of 26)” who was trying to keep the vehicle from driving on the snife of the patrol box, which was called “C,” and called “the victim F (the age of 26).”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the crime of this case is not likely to be committed for about 20 minutes that interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the crime of this case is likely to have occurred, and the defendant is against the time of committing the crime of this case, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, and it seems that there was no injury to police officers, etc., and the punishment of this case is determined as ordered by the order, comprehensively taking into account all the factors of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, occupation and family relation, etc.