beta
(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2015.12.18 2014가합1725

총회결의무효확인

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 10, 1998, the defendant is a reconstruction maintenance project association that has obtained approval for the establishment of a housing reconstruction project under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents for the purpose of implementing a housing reconstruction project by making B apartment in North-gu D as a project implementation district, and the plaintiff is a former director of the defendant

B. On September 19, 2014, the Defendant decided to hold a council of delegates to request the president of the Defendant’s association to hold an extraordinary general meeting.

(hereinafter referred to as the “Board of Representatives of this case”).

In accordance with the request to hold an extraordinary general meeting of the instant council, E announced and notified the convocation of an extraordinary general meeting on October 4, 2014, and the Defendant tried to hold an extraordinary general meeting on the 303rd floor (former North Korean Branch Association), the 15:00 of the 15:00 of the same month, North-gu, North-gu, Mapo-ro, 303, Mapo-ro, Mapo-ro, Mapo-ro, Mapo-ro, Mapo-ro, Mapo-ro, but

After that, the plaintiff proposed 186 members of the union, and ordered the defendant's members to call an extraordinary general meeting, and accordingly, the plaintiff passed a resolution on the removal of the president E, directors G, H, I, I, and the audit and inspectionJ from office in the extraordinary general meeting held on November 9, 2014.

(hereinafter “the first special meeting of this case”) and a resolution made at the said special meeting (hereinafter “the first resolution of this case”). E.

On the other hand, on October 24, 2014, E issued a notice of convening and convening an extraordinary meeting on November 14, 201 of the same year at the request of the board of representatives, such as the foregoing Paragraph (b), and postponed the extraordinary meeting on November 29 of the same month. Accordingly, the Defendant held an extraordinary meeting on the first floor of the missionary officer (former North Korean Association) in C14:00 as stated in the above Paragraph (c).

In the above special meeting, a resolution on each agenda stated in the attached Table 1, including a resolution to elect E as the head of the association, was made.

The term "the second special meeting of this case" is constituted at the above special meeting.