피고인들에 대하여 : 특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)의 점에 관한 사실오인 또는 법리오해 피고인들은 정상적으로 멍게 양식을 하려는 의사가 있는 것처럼 보상금 산정기관을 기망하고자 M어촌계 복합양식어장(이하 ‘이 사건 양식장’이라 한다)에 최소한의 간승(間繩)줄만 설치하고, 부이(buoy, 물 위에 띄우는 항로 표지의 일종) 개수도 부족한 하자투성이의 시설물을 설치하여 시늉으로만 멍게 종묘를 입식(入殖)한 후, 멍게를 실제 생산한 사실이 없음에도 보상금 산정의 기초자료인 설문지에 생산 개시 연도, 생산기간 등을 허위 기재하여 이에 속은 피해자 한국가스공사로부터 어업피해 보상금을 편취하였다.

As such, although the defendants can sufficiently recognize the fact that they committed a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), the court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles.

Defendant

In respect of A and B, unreasonable sentencing: The sentence imposed by the lower court on Defendant A and B (the fine of KRW 500,000 is too uneased and unreasonable.

The summary of the facts charged of judgment on the nature of the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes and the summary of the judgment of the court below in this part of the facts charged is as follows: Defendant A, C, and D, a member or executive officer of M fishing Village fraternity L, for the purpose of receiving compensation for fishery damage under T construction (hereinafter “instant construction”) with respect to the instant cultivation; Defendant B, in collusion with Defendant B, partially input only insufficient facilities and equipment to conduct normal production; made the appearance similar to the normal cultivation, and then, in the instant cultivation paper for the investigation of fishery damage (hereinafter “instant text”), from 2010 to 15 months from the date of the instant cultivation.