beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.05.18 2017고단2488

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is engaged in driving a vehicle BM3 in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving).

On October 31, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol level of 01:40%, the Defendant driven the said SM3 car on the front of the parking site of the “D cafeteria” parking site located in the Gu, in Ansan-si, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.123% during the influence of alcohol level, and got back the two-lane road from right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to to right

A person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to safely drive the wheel and left well, and to prevent accidents in advance by operating the steering wheel and brakes accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was unable to drive in a normal manner, such as a rhythm, a string, red string, etc., and was driven by the Defendant’s negligence at the rear end of the above SM3 passenger vehicle of the Defendant’s driving, and was stopped at the lower end of the above SM3 passenger vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of alcohol, sustained injury such as fluoral salt in light of the border line that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim E, and suffered injury such as the victim G (V, 30 years of age), and H (V, 26 years of age) who was boarding the said K7 motor vehicle.

2. Defendant 1 driven a SM3 vehicle as stated in the above Paragraph 1 from the Do in front of the parking site of “D cafeteria” as stated in the above Paragraph 1 to the adjacent road under the influence of alcohol level of 0.123% at the time of the day immediately preceding the day, as shown in the above Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and H:

1. Each written statement of G and I;

1. The fact-finding survey report and the state-finding report;