However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around July 13, 2007, the Defendant leased the said apartment as a deposit for lease on a deposit basis to the victim, who borrowed the said apartment as a deposit for lease on a deposit basis from E (E) while leasing the said apartment as a deposit for lease on a deposit basis.

On May 25, 2009, the Defendant, at the G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Kimpo-si F, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, stating that “The Defendant returned KRW 70 million,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won

However, the defendant did not fully repay the above loans.

The Defendant received 70 million won as a check from the victim in the face of the deposit for lease, namely, the check, and acquired it by fraud.

No person of "2018 Highest 221" shall borrow or lend a means of access while receiving, demanding or promising compensation.

Nevertheless, on May 20, 2018, the Defendant, who introduced himself as a lending business operator, sent a e-mail card in writing and by telephone from the person in poor name who was introduced as the lending business operator, and then sent the e-mail card with low credit rating so that it is difficult to lend. At present, e-mail card is sent to the e-mail card connected to the e-mail account, raising the credit rating by setting up the content of the use of the card, and raising the credit rating.” On the same day, the Defendant sent the e-mail card connected to the H non-bank account in the name of the Defendant at the H bank account (J), K (L), and M bank account (N).

As a result, the Defendant promised to receive intangible expected gains from future loans and lent the means of access to his/her name in return for the lending.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1852"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The second police against the defendant;