However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 10, 2017, around 04:50, the Defendant: (a) heard the circumstances of the instant case against the Defendant, the Victim F (27 tax) who was a policeman affiliated with the E District Party, who was a male member of the E District Party, when the Defendant was male, and was dispatched to the Defendant on April 10, 2017; (b) prevented the Defendant who committed assault by going against the Defendant, who was sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually,

In this regard, the victim's chilling theory was made twice, and the victim's chilling part was made twice again, the victim's chilling part was made twice, the victim's chilling part was made three times, the chilling part was made three times, and the part of the buckbucks part was made up of the right side, the right side of which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment for the victim, and the part of the chilling part was made up of the chilling part.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on 112 Report and Control of Crime, and at the same time injured the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a medical certificate, investigation report (related to the degree of damage, hearing of victim telephone statements);

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act include: (a) the Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he had the record of having already been punished for the same kind of crime; and (b) the fact that the nature of the instant crime is not good in light of the substance of the said crime; (c) on the other hand, the Defendant is led to confession and reflect; (d) the Defendant is contingent; (c) the victim is a contingent crime; (d) the degree of injury of the victim; and (e) the fact that the Defendant deposited some of the money (1 million won) during the instant trial.