For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court found Defendant A guilty of the charge of occupational breach of trust, and found the Defendants not guilty of the violation of the Road Traffic Act, which is the primary charge against the Defendants, on the ground that there is no proof of a crime, and found the Defendants guilty of the ancillary charge of the aiding and abetting

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and duly admitted evidence, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on occupational breach of trust and aiding and abetting.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.