The judgment below

In light of the records, it is reasonable that the court below maintained the first instance court that acquitted each of the facts charged of this case on the ground that there is no proof of the crime.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there are no errors of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence and exceeding the bounds of logical and empirical rules, or of misapprehending the legal principles as to the meaning of “abstinence or apprehension” or “abstinence” under Article 74(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.