beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.08.04 2016고정38

폭행

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant worked together with the victim C (46 years) and D in Ycheon City D.

around 14:50 on October 8, 2015, the Defendant, at the loading station of the first floor of the building above the Defendant, was crypted by the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant was negligent in performing his/her duties, and that the Defendant was trees;

E. The victim assaulted the victim, such as the victim's face face part at one time by head, while called "A. I.C."

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of the accused or C by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police officer against the defendant or C;

1. Investigation report (the ratio of name of the crime and the case of securing CCTV, etc.);

1. CCTV recording CDs;

1. The defendant asserts that the CCTV image analysis photograph (the defendant and his defense counsel did not have the face of the victim due to his head.

However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by the above evidence, the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that he/she was faced with the victim's face.

The victim made a concrete and consistent statement from the police investigation to the law.

When the injured person was arrested, differently from the fact to the effect that “the injured person was assaulted three times by drinking the face,” the police investigation was made to the effect that “the injured person first made a false statement to cope with it” from the time of the initial arrest of the accused, and that the damaged person’s explanation is considerably acceptable in light of the initial statement at the time of arrest of the accused and the inconsistent statement at the investigative agency.

The victim came out of the loading station, which is the place where the case occurred at the time of investigation by the prosecution, to the effect that “the defendant reported to the police as his cell phone and tried to catch the defendant’s arms, and the defendant reported to the police after the ppuri.”