However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On December 18, 2013, the Defendant loaned money to the victim D to comply with the right to operate the Etel sales agency business in the vicinity of the Dunsan-si, Namyang-si. The Defendant would pay 5% interest per annum until December 10, 2014. < Amended by Act No. 12835, Dec. 10, 2014>

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, at the time, the defendant was in excess of his/her obligation, and even if he/she receives profits through the sale by proxy, he/she did not have the intent or ability to

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he obtained 30 million won from the victim to receive 30 million won on the same day.

2. On April 28, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “The amount of KRW 50 million is required to operate a sales agency business for the Etel sales agency business” to the victim in the vicinity of the said railway station. The Defendant concluded that “The payment will be made as the sales agency business is completed.”

However, at the time, the defendant was in excess of his/her obligation, and even if he/she receives profits through the sale by proxy, he/she did not have the intent or ability to

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he obtained 20 million won from the victim to receive 20 million won on the same day.

3. On June 12, 2014, the Defendant purchased a model house from the victim in the vicinity of the mountain basin of the said town, “The purchase price for the model house was the mother.”

If the sales agency lends 30 million won, it shall be repaid as the completion of the sales agency business.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time, the defendant was in excess of his/her obligation, and even if he/she receives profits through the sale by proxy, he/she did not have the intent or ability to

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he obtained 30 million won from the victim to receive 30 million won on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained a total of KRW 80 million and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in the protocol of prosecutor's statement concerning D;

1. Criminal facts;