When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant

A is the representative of Section B, and the victim C is the production director of Section D, and the defendant agreed to lease the factory owned by Section D located in Section E in Ansan-si, Seoul-si, but temporarily paid only part of the down payment to Section D while operating the factory, which led to the delay in the middle contract due to the lack of funds of the defendant, which led to the occurrence of dispute between the defendant and Section D, and the contract is reversed.

The Defendant demanded that the Defendant pay the Defendant the factory use management expenses and the factory use management expenses for three months, which are expected to be incurred by the unilateral rescission of the contract before the contract of this case was terminated, and the Defendant accuseds that corrected the entrance and exit of the above factory using locks. On January 8, 2015, around 10:30 on January 8, 2015, the Defendant damaged the locks with which the victim corrected the factory entrance and exit door from the above factory using a cut machine and invaded it into the factory.

Accordingly, the defendant invadeds on the building managed by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.