If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 02:02 on December 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) sought a warning to the Defendant to calculate and return the drinking value from the slope E belonging to the D District Police Station of the Gyeong-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, upon receiving a report from the Defendant, that the Defendant did not pay the drinking value; and (b) sought a warning to the Defendant to return home from the slope belonging to the D District of the D District of the Gyeong-gu Police Station of the Gyeong-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City; (c) the Defendant’s fluencing of the flucing flucing fe, as the tax paid by the fluenc fe fe f, so that the fluen fe far far far far far far far fe

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the F and G respective Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. All circumstances, such as the reflection of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment, the surgery of alcohol, and the fact that an agreement is made with the victimized police officer, the initial crime, and the fact that it is economically difficult to lead a workplace life because it is difficult to do so due to its failure to do so;