Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Defendant

B The term “E” is a person who operates a club mutually, and Defendant A is a person who has been a customer in the club.

1. On December 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around the entrance of the E club in Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, on December 24, 2017, around 04:10, the Defendant: (b) before the victim B (45) had known the Defendant, a customer, to the police station by obstructing his/her duties; (c) had been suffering from a dispute with the said location on the ground that he/she did not go against the notification to the police station by obstructing his/her duties; (d) had the victim’s chest caused his/her finger; and (e) had the victim’s face knife with his/her finger, she laid the victim’s knife and laid the victim’s face for about 21 days.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, and on the ground that the victim A (31 taxes) laid her chest with her chest and her face is boomed, her flaps were set up against the victim’s her hand, and her flaps were cut off with her flaps, and when her flaps were taken on her face with drinking her 35 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendants' respective legal statements (the defendant A is on the second trial date)

1. Application of each injury diagnosis certificate (A) statute;

1. Relevant legal provisions and choice of punishment for the crime - Articles 257(1) of the Criminal Act - Selection of fines for the defendant A - Selection of imprisonment with prison labor for the defendant B

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act of Defendant A;

1. Provisional payment order: Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of Defendant A;

1. Suspension of execution: Defendant B’s Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (which is punishable by a fine for the same type of crime and is sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment, and the degree of injury inflicted upon the victim A is not provided against the victim A. However, Defendant B, on the ground that the victim’s business obstruction is against the victim, is seriously against and led to the crime of this case. On January 12, 2018, the victim and the victim did not want to be punished against the Defendant.