When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 18, 2015, between 18:30 and 03:30 on July 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the “K’s drinking house managed by the injured party J during the strike; (b) seeing that the injured party J I scams and scams the horses regardless of his will to the customers who drink; (c) performed the act such as drinking, drinking, etc. for a certain period of time; and (d) 7-8 team customers who drink the said alcohol to drink and drink the alcohol; and (c) scam, one team’s customers who drink the said alcohol to the restaurant, which is managed by the person who was immediately next to the said gathering, and continued to do so; and (d) scams, the Defendant scams and scamscams, etc.; and (d) scamscams, the Defendant scams and scamscamscam.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate main business of the victim by force for about nine hours.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of J, M and N;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (Attachment to a photograph ofCCTV images).

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the defendant, and considering the fact that the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant upon agreement with the victim on March 22, 2016, etc.