However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 27, 2013, from around 16:00 to July 21:15, 2013, the Defendant installed 20 game 20 game equipment, a game product not classified, and provided many unspecified customers who visited the game to use the game machine, and exchanged the remaining points at KRW 9,000 per 10,000.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified to customers for their use, and exchanged the results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 44 (1) 2, 32 (1) 1 (the provision of a game product without classification) of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry Selection and Punishment, and Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry (the fact of exchanging results acquired through the use of game products and the selection of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (i.e., reflectment, previous and current crimes, a relatively short period of crime, and the fact that the defendant is a disabled person under the Welfare of Disabled Persons Act);

1. Article 44 (2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act, Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act;