물품대금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. Comprehensively taking into account the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4-1 to 4, and 5-1, Gap evidence Nos. 2, and 1 to 2.2, the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff the price if the plaintiff supplied the goods, such as yellow bond, to the defendant. ② The plaintiff supplied the defendant with yellow bond equivalent to KRW 40,540,000 for several occasions during the period from August 29, 2014 to November 12, 2014 (the above amount of KRW 400,000,000,000 won for KRW 401.4,000,000 on August 29, 2014; KRW 201,344,000 on August 31, 2014; KRW 201,00,000 on September 2, 2014; and KRW 400,00,000 on June 14, 2014
According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 4,20,000 won for the remaining goods and to pay damages for delay at the rate of 20% per annum from July 11, 2015 to the day following the day of service of a copy of the complaint of this case to the day of full payment of the copy of the complaint of this case, under the main text of Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings and the main text of Article 3(1) of the former Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings (wholly amended by Presidential Decree No. 26553, Sep
2. The defendant's defense of the defendant's defense of the defendant's defense of the defendant's defense of the payment of goods beyond the recognized scope as above, but there is no evidence to deem that the defendant paid goods beyond the above recognized scope, and therefore,
3. The plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.