국가유공자비해당결정처분취소
1. The decision that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on May 8, 2012 constituted the requirement of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State shall be revoked.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On August 1, 2003, the Plaintiff served as the so-called officer at the Army Academy at the Army, and from November 28, 2003 to March 23, 2005, from the Army Training C Educational Team at the Army Training Academy at the Army, the Plaintiff served as the captain and the teaching staff.
B. On February 21, 2005, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at the Yancheon National University Hospital as an anti-monthly diversative diversative diversative diversative diversical diversative diversical diversative diversical diversical diversical diversical diversical diversical diversical diversical diversical diversical diversical dives
C. On December 6, 2006, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with the instant wounds, etc. on December 18, 2006, when the Plaintiff was performing an anti-scopic fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral bru
The plaintiff was discharged on April 30, 2007.
E. On May 23, 2007, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant on the left-hand knee, kneeing, etc.
F. On October 22, 2007, the Defendant rendered a decision on the eligibility of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State (hereinafter “instant prior disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff did not recognize the background leading up to the occurrence of military service as an officer who is a resident outside the territory, and the instant injury, etc. were not recognized as an official related to official duties.
G. On November 30, 2010, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the part on the left-hand knee, among the preceding dispositions by Suwon District Court Decision 2008Gudan4552, with respect to the instant preceding dispositions, and was sentenced to the Plaintiff’s winning judgment (hereinafter “instant preceding judgment”).
H. The Defendant appealed to the instant preceding judgment as Seoul High Court No. 201Nu237, but was sentenced to the dismissal on June 24, 2011. The Defendant appealed to the Supreme Court Decision No. 2011Du17073 on September 29, 201, but the instant preceding judgment became final and conclusive on September 29, 201.
I. The Plaintiff’s soldier and policeman’s duty is required by the preceding judgment.